Content – the forgotten treasure on the legaltech treasure map

In this conversation, we chat with Tim Perry, Director of Practical Law for Asia and Emerging Markets at Thomson Reuters.

Tim and I have known each other for more than a decade, having both started our careers at Mallesons Stephen Jaques in universe far away a long time ago. Tim is a fountain of knowledge on all manners of things, but on legal content in particular. Legal content is a subject that does not receive a lot of attention in the legal technology landscape, and this lack of attention is something which Tim and his team address at Practical Law Australia.

In this video, we chatted about:

  • the continuing decline of Facebook (admittedly, this is not a subject we know deeply, but we found the topic had interesting parallels to legaltech)

  • where are point solutions more appropriate and where are platforms more appropriate

  • an example of legal content – Thomson Reuters’ Cleardocs precedents, and what sort of people are using this product (https://www.cleardocs.com/)

  • how do you distinguish “good content” from “bad content”

  • what is the value of content to lawyers, and how do you explain the value of content as a vendor

  • how defining the “value” to customers is the heart of any product offering

  • process innovation compared to content innovation

  • what lawyers have to do for their clients, and the roles of process tools and content products

… it all comes down to how you are able to explain the value of your product. Cause once there is an understanding of value, then it’s not about “here’s the number; I like it; I don’t like it”. [It is about] this is the value I am going to get. How do I get that value? What am I giving up to secure that?
— From timestamp 13:23

You would love for you to watch our chat in the video below:

Transcript of conversation


(Note: transcript is automatically generated, and may contain misspellings and typographical errors)

00:00

so welcome to another casual

00:02

conversation today we're talking to tim

00:04

perry

00:04

the director of practical law for asia

00:07

and emerging markets at thomson reuters

00:09

tim welcome to a very casual

00:11

conversation

00:12

thank you horace lovely to be here i'd

00:14

love to chat to you it's good to chat to

00:16

you as well

00:17

so just before we started recording we

00:19

were talking about

00:20

the the dying state of facebook what's

00:23

your hypothesis

00:24

and i know it's not your you know bread

00:26

and butter but what's your hypothesis

00:28

for why

00:28

facebook is dying i think it's it's

00:31

become

00:33

too many things in one place and the

00:36

parts of facebook that

00:37

work and that are still needed and

00:39

necessary are almost sort of

00:41

sniffing off and becoming their own

00:42

thing you know you've got and facebook's

00:44

been acquiring companies so this is

00:46

you know may actually a bit faster but

00:47

you've got those who really want to be

00:49

using

00:49

some sort of technology to share images

00:51

of their life and show what they're

00:52

doing we always use facebook you know

00:53

this is my status this is where i am

00:55

now you can do that on instagram or you

00:58

can use twitter

01:00

and have political arguments there if

01:01

that's what you want to want to do you

01:02

want to get into your rants twitter is

01:04

the place for that not not facebook

01:05

posts

01:06

if you want to communicate with your

01:10

older parents or your grandparents

01:11

facebook still kind of does that for you

01:13

there are parts of facebook that work

01:15

like a really effective marketplace and

01:16

if you're doing you know

01:18

you're buying and selling of stuff you

01:19

can do it on ebay you can do it in the

01:20

facebook marketplace marketplace is

01:22

probably going to continue to live on

01:23

and become its own thing

01:24

but facebook is a large sort of

01:26

autoconnect platform where you go and do

01:28

all your digital stuff

01:30

is no longer where people want to be

01:31

you've got discreet apps for discreet

01:33

things that you want to do in your life

01:34

and that's where people will continue to

01:36

go

01:36

unless you're older older than us and

01:39

you kind of just want to go one

01:40

place and do just all there and then

01:41

it's just simple because you can you can

01:43

post your photos and you can message

01:44

your children and realize that they're

01:45

not getting back to you because they all

01:46

use the application

01:48

that is a hilarious description of what

01:50

is happening at the moment

01:52

and you kind of led us to a really

01:54

interesting point

01:55

and i didn't know we're going to go here

01:58

and it's the idea of

02:00

platformization versus point solutions

02:04

um and in legal tech something that's

02:07

been happening over the last couple of

02:08

years

02:09

is this debate over do we

02:12

provide a kind of a one-stop shop or do

02:15

we

02:16

provide point solutions that solve

02:19

specific tasks really well

02:22

what's your take what do you think is

02:24

the future of the market

02:26

there's such a tension there isn't there

02:27

there is such attention because

02:30

on the one hand you can have a whole

02:33

bunch of

02:34

things that kind of

02:38

encapsulate a lawyer's work day and they

02:41

can all be there in one

02:42

one place but if they're not really good

02:45

at

02:45

solving the pain point then

02:48

even though the lawyers got them they

02:50

won't use them and and you're going to

02:52

be

02:52

producing inefficiency by providing a

02:55

technological solution which

02:56

doesn't tickle the boxes enough to

02:59

actually have people engage with it even

03:00

if it would get them

03:01

sort of 75 there is within

03:04

i think the user market because people

03:06

are not experts in technology they're

03:08

experts in their job

03:09

right technology needs to be kind of

03:11

invisible to them they're not going to

03:12

be looking for well if i go to the

03:14

the platform and because these things

03:15

within uh then i'll use it and

03:17

maybe it's not the perfect answer let's

03:18

go forget it i'll go and find a point

03:20

solution online via google

03:22

that will give me the thing that i want

03:23

now right whether it's content whether

03:25

it's a process

03:26

people looking for a thing i'll go and

03:28

find it i'll just use that

03:30

i mean i'll give you an example i'm

03:33

not trying to shield for my company but

03:34

i'm just giving you an example there's a

03:36

there's a product that we have

03:37

um called clear docs right which is a

03:40

it's not my product i don't work on

03:41

clean docs

03:42

it's an australian product um what it is

03:44

effectively

03:45

is precedence for non-lawyers right

03:48

it's it's a product that effectively was

03:51

designed for accountants because

03:52

accountants can't give legal advice

03:53

right accounts can't give legal advice

03:54

but they often want to be able to

03:55

provide the client with a with a simple

03:57

legal document so this product you know

04:00

it's been signed off by maddox they're

04:01

the lawyers sitting behind it

04:03

you answer a questionnaire it spits out

04:04

a precedent you know that's what you use

04:06

and you can then go and give that to

04:08

your client that's what it was designed

04:09

for

04:10

really interestingly over the last 12 to

04:12

18 months

04:13

because people google i thought i i need

04:15

a precedent for

04:16

you know a self-managed superannuation

04:19

fund trust

04:20

yeah google pop it up we get we're

04:23

seeing

04:24

from our data analytics a whole bunch of

04:25

small law firms that are accessing these

04:28

documents

04:29

like they don't need them because

04:30

they're lawyers they can draft them

04:30

themselves right and many of them

04:32

subscribe to products either from us or

04:34

from other companies that provide them

04:35

with precedence

04:37

this is a really easy one to use you

04:39

know it's not part of the platform it's

04:41

just a discrete

04:42

you know point solution you you get the

04:45

press and you ask the question it gives

04:46

you the

04:46

the precedent and you can send it off

04:48

it's very simple

04:50

um and there are lawyers out there who

04:52

are using that

04:53

because they google for it rather than

04:55

the solutions that are

04:56

baked into the platforms they subscribe

04:58

for and spend lots of money on

05:01

so i think wow actually the question um

05:05

there needs to be a platform environment

05:08

because lawyers don't have to work

05:10

somewhere

05:11

but that platform would be better placed

05:13

to do

05:14

some things well and integrate with

05:17

other point solutions

05:18

that do other things well rather than i

05:21

think trying to be

05:21

all things to all people because if you

05:23

try to be all things to all people you

05:24

become facebook and no one will use you

05:26

right the province of your parents

05:29

you become nothing to everybody exactly

05:32

exactly

05:33

it's it's such a fascinating thing that

05:35

you've just described because

05:36

integration has become

05:38

one of those hot topics and one thing we

05:40

didn't quite talk about when we started

05:41

this conversation is

05:43

this video blog is focused on two things

05:46

one is how do lawyers become better

05:50

lawyers

05:50

and the other is what can technology do

05:54

so this idea of a platform

05:58

that does a few things really well and

06:00

then integrating

06:01

with point solutions that can do other

06:03

things even

06:04

better i think it's a it's a topic that

06:07

probably deserves its own conversation

06:09

but i'm going to take us back to the

06:11

clear docs

06:13

example that you gave because i want to

06:15

ask you

06:16

what your view is on on that platform

06:19

and maybe

06:20

scratch a little bit deeper um

06:23

do people find it because they are

06:26

looking for

06:27

the right content or are they finding it

06:30

because they're looking for

06:33

something else what's driving um

06:36

the search results it really is content

06:39

based people are looking for a person

06:41

and the number of people who will go oh

06:42

i need to to draft a

06:45

the self-managed super fund trusted is a

06:47

good example you know i need to draft

06:48

this type of date

06:49

if i haven't got experience in that

06:51

myself you know

06:53

where am i going to find an example i've

06:54

got a trustee that i use because i can

06:55

do the job for

06:57

yeah for software super i'm not sure do

06:59

you want to do lots of research into it

07:01

and figure out whether it's going to

07:02

work

07:02

that's going to take a lot of my time

07:04

maybe i'll just google and see what

07:05

comes up

07:06

oh look here's a here's a here's a

07:09

an online place where i can just buy

07:12

for a one-off payment the document that

07:14

i want

07:16

and it's signed off by another law firm

07:18

it's probably going to be fine

07:19

right it just needs a point of of need

07:22

and i think it's because they they kind

07:23

of target those

07:24

those precedents that are the ones that

07:26

you know accountants

07:27

traditionally wanted to use they're the

07:29

ones that may be a little bit off the

07:30

beaten track for your general commercial

07:32

lawyer and so

07:33

it can just be easier to kind of just

07:34

google and find something i mean if you

07:36

google for precedence it's amazing what

07:37

you can find i don't know if you've

07:38

spent a lot of time coming just to see

07:41

what's out there

07:42

there's a lot of things that people put

07:43

out there and some are great and some

07:44

are not so good and some are

07:45

endorsed by professional associations

07:47

and some are not you know you've got

07:49

um great suites of corporate documents

07:51

that have been put together by

07:53

venture capital associations um and

07:56

they're awesome and they're freely

07:57

available for people who are in the

07:58

industry and want to use them

07:59

um and if you're looking for stuff

08:01

people might not look at that and

08:03

if that's not going to meet your need

08:04

then where else do you go

08:06

so so interesting point there how do you

08:09

tell

08:10

good content from bad content

08:13

yeah it's a it's a difficult one isn't

08:16

it it is

08:17

because you you either need to be

08:19

getting it from a source that you trust

08:22

or spending your own time to verify

08:26

that it is right i mean it's like i've

08:29

got kids right and they're at school and

08:31

back when we were at school horus and

08:33

going back to the old the old days you

08:35

know

08:36

1930s and earlier

08:40

well i mean speaking of my own

08:42

experience if i was doing research for a

08:44

school project back in back in

08:46

early years of high school you know i

08:47

would i'd go to the school library and i

08:49

would find books on

08:50

say nazi germany whatever i'm

08:52

researching right encyclopedia

08:53

britannica

08:54

and then there was encarta on cd exactly

08:58

and you had to get them the cd rom and

08:59

you put it into the machine and you you

09:00

know you look it up

09:01

and there's a little music when it

09:03

starts right a little chime

09:05

exactly but that was sort of trusted

09:07

sources of knowledge you resp

09:09

you you relied on the fact that you know

09:12

not only did the the text have detailed

09:15

footnoting and annotations

09:16

but it was published by a reputable

09:17

company that republican company would be

09:19

stacking its reputation and putting this

09:21

document out

09:22

and spending a lot of money in producing

09:23

the book or the encyclopedia so

09:26

you would trust that they would

09:27

eliminate errors nowadays

09:31

of course you've got all sorts of stuff

09:32

online and you know wikipedia is is one

09:35

source and there's other sources that

09:36

you can go to and

09:38

i'm trying to understand what's

09:41

motivating my

09:41

my son's research habits has been really

09:44

quite illuminating because

09:45

you know initially it was a case of i

09:47

just google and i find a thing and it's

09:48

the first thing in the list and so

09:49

therefore it must be right

09:51

but you know and wikipedia can be quite

09:54

good but you've got to go through and

09:55

you've got to go like well what are the

09:56

source documents where are they getting

09:58

this information from is it correlated

09:59

by other

10:00

results that i can find online are they

10:02

coming from the press are they coming

10:03

from

10:04

some random blog by some person that i

10:06

cannot verify their identity of well

10:08

maybe that's not quite so reliable

10:09

um and it's the same process that you

10:11

have to bring to to legal research and

10:13

you're doing your you're googling you're

10:14

trying to find you know answers to legal

10:16

questions

10:17

do you have trust in the source of that

10:20

information

10:22

or are you going to be having to spend

10:24

time

10:25

i think i i may have said this in

10:27

another forum as well but

10:29

there's a cost to relying on information

10:31

that you you can't

10:32

um that you don't know the source of it

10:34

you can't verify the source of it

10:35

quickly because you either

10:37

make a call and assume the risk that

10:39

maybe maybe it's not right

10:41

um and that that risk can be you know

10:43

quite expensive for you or for the

10:44

person who's relying on the legal

10:46

services you're providing

10:47

or you uh you spend the time and incur

10:50

the cost of

10:51

verifying the resource doing the double

10:53

checking comparing it to other available

10:55

information and that you know either way

10:58

you'll

10:59

your spending resource whether it be

11:01

your time or

11:02

the assumption of risk there are so many

11:05

threats there

11:06

i mean sorry no it's it's fantastic

11:11

like the uprising of wikipedia the

11:13

critical thinking that people

11:15

need when they're faced with um

11:17

information

11:19

the ability to verify and and what is

11:22

considered

11:22

credible is it content is it authorship

11:25

is it something else

11:26

and then this idea of reducing

11:30

the equation down to cost

11:33

right that is neat i i haven't heard you

11:37

say that before i haven't heard anyone

11:39

say that before but it makes sense

11:42

especially from a business perspective

11:45

and i think you know when we think about

11:47

you know solutions like

11:48

obviously with practical law it's a it's

11:50

a content solution we solve a

11:51

subscription model

11:52

you kind of have to articulate these

11:54

these costs because when you

11:56

front up to someone and you say you know

11:59

you can subscribe to practical law you

12:00

get this content you have

12:02

access to the brains of the writing team

12:05

who are creating this content keeping it

12:06

up to date

12:07

and here's the price tag and they go

12:08

well that's money right you want me to

12:10

put my hand in my wallet and

12:11

spend money now and you kind of have to

12:13

say well yes

12:15

um because if you don't well how are you

12:18

getting your

12:19

content where are you getting it from

12:20

and what are the hidden costs that

12:22

you're not

12:22

taking into account because it's not a

12:24

case of these dollars or nothing

12:26

it's these dollars or the cost of your

12:29

time

12:30

the cost of the risk you assume the you

12:32

know at the other costs that are

12:34

there as part of your efficiency or

12:36

inefficiency in doing your job so

12:38

it's that broader sort of what is the

12:40

investment you're making and

12:41

how do you how do you calculate the

12:45

return you're going to get

12:46

and what are you comparing it to that's

12:47

that sort of mental journey you kind of

12:49

got to go on in order to make an

12:51

appropriate decision about whether you

12:52

want to buy you know

12:53

our product or another product that

12:54

provides a solution to

12:57

a content need or a process need right

13:00

what is the most challenging part about

13:02

trying to

13:03

bring someone along this story this

13:06

journey of explaining

13:08

hear your costs today hear your costs

13:10

tomorrow

13:11

why don't we talk about it and settle on

13:13

an amount you're comfortable with what

13:15

what's your take on these pricing

13:17

conversations with customers yeah

13:20

it's it's difficult i think it all comes

13:23

down to

13:25

how you're able to explain the value of

13:28

your product because once there's an

13:31

understanding of value

13:33

then then it's not about

13:36

um here's the number and i like it i

13:39

don't like it

13:40

it's for what's this the value i'm going

13:41

to get how do i get that value

13:44

and then what am i giving up to secure

13:47

that i mean

13:48

i had a um a conversation with a

13:49

customer a little while ago

13:51

and it was really interesting um talking

13:53

to them because

13:55

they had you know everyone's got a

13:58

limited budget they were in house

13:59

team they had a limited budget of what

14:01

they could spend on on solutions

14:03

and they had decided to invest in

14:06

process

14:06

innovations so they had spent money on

14:08

process innovations because they've been

14:10

able to see the value

14:12

in what these innovations going to do

14:14

for the way in which they got

14:16

instructions from their

14:17

business the way in which they managed

14:20

the work

14:20

within their legal team so there was a

14:23

lot of a lot of that kind of stuff right

14:25

um though in which they were able to

14:27

keep their

14:28

documents and their own internal

14:30

internally generated know-how

14:31

ordered so that's what they kind of

14:33

spent money on what they were wanting to

14:34

spend money on in this particular case

14:36

was additional content solutions

14:39

and in a way although they'd created a

14:42

lot of

14:43

value by taking on those process

14:46

innovations

14:47

that value in terms of their ability to

14:49

use their time effectively was eroded

14:52

by their not taking on an equivalent

14:55

content solution

14:56

because whenever they needed to think

14:58

about stuff which was not within the

14:59

narrow confines of their own

15:01

deep expertise their process of getting

15:04

that information was very inefficient

15:06

so they were almost saving themselves

15:07

time to be inefficient in their research

15:10

getting to the value part and gay couple

15:13

yeah

15:13

were all those solutions the right ones

15:15

for you to to purchase i mean

15:16

individually that makes sense to the

15:18

process

15:19

but when you look at your business unit

15:22

as a whole and the tasks that you do

15:23

as a whole actually maybe the saving of

15:27

time or money you're getting out of that

15:28

particular application is not worth what

15:30

you're giving up

15:32

in not being smart about your your

15:34

research solutions

15:35

and trying to have those conversations

15:37

to calibrate can be

15:39

quite tricky i know um there are some

15:41

consultants out there who work with

15:43

with in-house teams in particular and

15:44

they're really good at

15:46

kind of coming in alongside the business

15:48

and taking a little bit of the pain out

15:49

of it because they

15:50

they kind of bring an independent

15:51

perspective and they're not not selling

15:53

for any particular

15:54

vendor they're just there to kind of

15:56

provide a consulting service okay well

15:57

we've seen what departments like yours

15:59

do this might be good this might be good

16:01

because they've already got that kind of

16:03

position of trust and not coming in as a

16:04

vendor

16:05

even though often they will get a you

16:07

know kind of any subscription or there's

16:08

some sort of

16:09

you know there's some sort of financial

16:10

incentive for them to sell stuff that's

16:12

not the

16:13

the mindset with which they come and

16:15

it's not the mindset which they heard so

16:16

i think there's an openness to

16:18

to listening to what they have to say

16:19

that may not be there when a customer is

16:21

speaking directly to a provider of a

16:23

solution that's kind of a hurdle that

16:24

we have to overcome through value

16:27

yeah i think i think it's um it's an

16:30

interesting point

16:31

um the the kind of trustedness of the

16:33

voice

16:34

plays a role when they kind of the the

16:36

idea that maybe

16:37

there's a vested that there's the vested

16:39

interest or there's an ulterior motive

16:41

um but something else you said was quite

16:44

interesting and i'm going to link it

16:45

back to

16:47

what we're talking about earlier with

16:48

platforms versus point solutions versus

16:51

integration

16:52

and that is in the legal tech space

16:55

mostly what people are talking about are

16:58

process-based

16:59

technologies the technological solution

17:03

that people are providing

17:05

leads to in improved efficiency

17:09

usually by changing the way people work

17:12

very rarely

17:13

do people talk about content as a part

17:15

of that equation

17:17

yeah i think that's a big missing piece

17:20

of the jigsaw puzzle

17:22

if the assumption is true that people

17:24

are not thinking enough about content

17:26

today

17:28

what do we do to help the legal sector

17:32

or the legal profession

17:35

yeah i mean this is kind of the core of

17:37

my of my role away because obviously my

17:39

solution is a

17:40

content solution um and it really is

17:43

about trying to explain

17:45

the value and efficiency that we bring

17:47

and and the value of that

17:49

to a customer i think looking over my

17:51

legal career you know i started at uh at

17:54

keyword malice as as did you before it

17:56

was king of bells it was back in the day

17:57

there's males and stephen jackson we've

17:58

both moved through different firms we've

18:00

been at internationals we've been at

18:02

large domestics

18:04

we've seen different things come and go

18:06

timekeeping is one which was really

18:08

interesting you know there have been

18:09

various solutions for tracking time

18:12

spent during the day so you can

18:14

effectively get your time sheets in and

18:16

build the right clients the right

18:17

amounts

18:19

that's always that's always been one of

18:20

those solutions which is interesting and

18:22

they've changed over time right there's

18:23

there's been the start stop clock that

18:25

you do yourself there's been the smart

18:26

solution that sits in the background and

18:28

kind of keeps

18:28

track of well you're on you know google

18:32

chrome for this long you are on you know

18:34

your email for this long and you're

18:35

emailing these people it can kind of

18:36

spit data at you that you can then

18:38

refine without actually having to do the

18:39

start stop clock thing um

18:43

back when i started we were using pen

18:45

and paper you know

18:46

to to track your day you know what am i

18:49

doing time starting

18:50

the end of the day okay i've manually

18:51

entered my time sheets for the day

18:53

so different things have changed over

18:55

time but ultimately what you've needed

18:56

to do

18:56

is account for your time so you can

18:58

build your client right yep

19:00

from a professional services point of

19:03

view for all the process innovations you

19:04

want to bring

19:05

to bear at the end of the day

19:08

you have to be providing legal services

19:10

to your client and those legal services

19:12

are based on your expertise as a lawyer

19:15

and your

19:15

ability as an expert lawyer to take

19:19

raw information about your client's

19:21

situation

19:22

the applicable law market practice

19:25

regulator guidelines and turn that into

19:28

an answer to their question

19:31

now you can bring to bear lots of

19:32

different process tools

19:35

in in that process but ultimately

19:39

you're going to have to provide an

19:40

answer and to provide an answer you need

19:41

to be able to

19:42

understand those different categories of

19:44

information

19:46

filter them and apply critical thinking

19:48

to how they interrelate

19:49

in the given situation and to do that

19:52

yes you'll need to use your expertise

19:54

but you've got to get that stuff quickly

19:56

right

19:58

and you have to get on top of those

19:59

different areas of information quickly

20:00

in order to be able to to do that

20:02

high-level thinking

20:03

so do you want to waste your time going

20:06

through free websites

20:07

or instructing a junior to do three

20:09

hours of research which you then have to

20:10

review and

20:11

send them back to redo or do you want to

20:13

go to a content solution

20:15

that has you know enough credibility and

20:18

trust behind it that you know you don't

20:20

have to do deep interrogation

20:21

of whether it's right you can use it to

20:24

give you a quick

20:26

guide to the law or the guidelines from

20:28

the regulators or whatever it is in the

20:30

situation that you're in

20:31

you can use it to signpost the key cases

20:33

and ledge that you need to go look at

20:35

for more detail given the bespoke

20:37

scenario that your client has got

20:40

content is always going to be so

20:43

crucial to being able to do your job

20:45

right as a lawyer

20:47

and i think it's making sure people

20:49

understand that that

20:50

journey that they go through intuitively

20:53

um

20:54

just being able to get them to step back

20:55

and go okay this is actually what i'm

20:56

doing each day okay no i do

20:58

i do need that content so how do i get

21:00

it where am i getting it now you know

21:01

what am i doing to

21:02

to get this stuff you know am i getting

21:04

cases from

21:05

a trusted database which you know treats

21:08

the cases and updates them and makes

21:10

sure that you know there's a digest

21:11

behind it and

21:12

i can see flags if things are being

21:14

overturned or not or am i going through

21:15

a free resource in front of the case and

21:16

then going okay well

21:17

now how do i check this case is still

21:20

current it hasn't been overturned or

21:21

overruled from the point that i care

21:23

about

21:23

and there's a lot of research that goes

21:25

into that unless you're using a solution

21:26

which you can trust which already has

21:28

done that work it's the legwork right

21:30

lawyers are so busy you're constantly

21:32

you know getting calls from clients

21:33

you're trying to run matters you're

21:35

trying to do deals

21:36

who's got time to stay up to date on the

21:38

minutiae

21:39

of what's coming out of the courts

21:41

legislatures the regulator every day

21:43

only lawyers whose job is to do that and

21:46

nothing else

21:46

and that's what my team has um and

21:49

that's what you know i think

21:50

the best content solutions do whether it

21:52

be on a sort of know-how basis like ours

21:55

or

21:55

you know whether it's like a like a case

21:58

and legislation

21:59

database or if it's a you know a clause

22:02

bank you know you have to have the right

22:03

stuff it has to be

22:05

accessible at the point of need and you

22:07

have to be able to get it quickly and

22:09

know that it's right

22:10

that that's what's going to be helping

22:11

you to generate value for your client

22:15

it sounds a little bit um like adam

22:18

smith's specialization

22:20

right like like you you want to you want

22:22

to kind of if you think about law like a

22:24

production line

22:26

um your everyday lawyers

22:29

the ones who you know everyday people

22:31

think about are the ones at the end

22:33

that assemble and put together the

22:35

advice but all the raw materials

22:38

everything that goes into that final

22:41

production assembly process has to be

22:44

done by someone else

22:46

like who's farming the wheat who's

22:48

pulling the iron from the ground

22:50

yeah that's a really good analogy yeah i

22:53

think that's absolutely right

22:55

so i'm going to make a little flipping

22:57

comment here and i don't know how

22:59

i don't know how true this is going to

23:00

be is facebook dying because the content

23:04

on there is no longer interesting or is

23:08

it dying because

23:09

there is such a flood of content that it

23:12

is not

23:13

possible to efficiently winnow out the

23:16

stuff that you don't care about from the

23:17

stuff that you do

23:18

because it's so hard to win about the

23:20

things that you care about

23:22

you ignore it entirely and you follow

23:24

people on twitter

23:25

or insta or whenever you use whatsapp to

23:29

do your messaging

23:31

it's two sides of the same coin right

23:33

like

23:35

on if there's too much content

23:38

well that's bad content if there's not

23:41

enough content

23:42

that's also bad content and it's kind of

23:45

this

23:46

zone of this goldilocks zone of just

23:48

right

23:49

yeah exactly that is that's really cool

23:52

now you're you're gonna be

23:53

um you or one of your colleagues will be

23:55

speaking at

23:56

uh ultacon um very soon and so i'm very

23:59

excited

24:00

yes i don't want to steal too much

24:02

thunder but

24:04

let's round off this video by just

24:06

quickly talking about

24:07

what you will be discussing at ultacon

24:10

this year

24:11

sure i think it's it's going to be very

24:14

much

24:15

a content solutions perspective on

24:18

legal tech and the role that content

24:21

still has to play in this world of

24:22

information

24:23

democratization i mean i've been saying

24:25

earlier wrong in this chat

24:27

yeah there's just so much information

24:28

now and it's so accessible it's not like

24:30

the old days where

24:32

i keep talking about the old days when i

24:33

worked in a law library as a summer

24:35

clerk and

24:36

you know i had to do loosely filing and

24:38

you know every every couple of months we

24:40

get a new cd-rom

24:41

of of digest to put in the cd tower at

24:44

the computer stack in the library would

24:45

come and you know look at

24:46

the needed cases the good old days i

24:49

know

24:50

but now it's just there's so much out

24:52

there so so

24:54

what is what is it that that we can do

24:56

to to better serve our clients and get

24:58

the right information

24:59

and just stepping back from that what

25:00

are the trends in the way in which

25:02

lawyers have been spending their money

25:03

and adopting

25:05

new technologies be it you know those

25:08

day-to-day technologies well not

25:09

dissimilar to this i mean

25:11

a couple of years ago when you had

25:14

conference calls

25:15

on international deals you were using

25:18

those style phones in the middle of the

25:19

table right i remember those star phones

25:21

yeah yeah everyone sounds like they're

25:23

about a million miles away

25:25

exactly and then someone's got the wrong

25:26

dial in and you're waiting on the call

25:28

and they're on a different call entirely

25:29

and that was that was

25:30

par for the course i remember sitting

25:32

around tables at you know a dla piper

25:34

trying to get counterparties on

25:36

on the line you know from overseas at

25:37

you know one in the morning and

25:40

yeah they were on the wrong conference

25:41

school we're emailing each other saying

25:42

which concerts will have you dialed into

25:44

now this is the one you have to use

25:46

over the last 12 months because the

25:48

pandemic everyone is on zoom or teams or

25:50

you know

25:51

or this google platform there's some

25:52

sort of online technology that they've

25:55

all adopted and that's been

25:56

that's been an innovation full of firms

25:59

very quickly and they're taking that on

26:00

so that's one style of spend people have

26:02

been undertaking there's the

26:04

the digital process efficiency products

26:06

people are buying and then there's

26:07

content so

26:07

the ways in which that that spend breaks

26:09

down has been really interesting you can

26:11

kind of see some trends

26:12

to who was ready who got really quickly

26:16

who's cutting their spend and where

26:17

they're coming to spend that sort of

26:19

data uh it can be quite insightful i

26:21

think i'm going to share some more

26:23

things around that

26:24

and then we'll go into uh my

26:27

subject of legal content and and and how

26:30

it can really empower lawyers you know

26:32

if you buy them the right way and

26:34

interact with them the right way

26:35

um through technology to do the job so

26:37

much better and more efficiently

26:40

wow tim that that is amazing i mean i i

26:44

can't wait to see it i think the data

26:45

that you're going to present is going to

26:46

be so telling

26:47

um and i don't know how many people in

26:50

the market would have access to data

26:52

like that so

26:53

for you to share it is is so kind

26:56

um so i'm i'm looking forward to it and

26:59

tim thank you for your time today

27:01

uh it's been such a fun conversation um

27:03

i do i do miss our coffee conversations

27:05

so

27:06

hopefully soon we'll be in the same

27:08

place at the same time to have a coffee

27:10

together

27:11

look forward to it it'll be on me

Previous
Previous

A masterclass in legal optimization – designing useful applications